S
SIBACUS
Satellite Parameter Comparison Matrix
Interactive Physics, Thermal & Financial Model: Tesla/SpaceX AI6 Baseline vs. Sibacus BSA-CIM
Export CSV
Download Excel (.xlsx)
Interactive Model Sensitivity Sliders
Real-time Recalculation Active
Launch Cost ($/kg):
$200
Target Constellation Compute:
324 EOPS
BSA-CIM Energy Efficiency:
0.24 pJ/op
AI6 Serving Utility:
12.0%
AI6 10-Yr Fleet CapEx
$38.0B
10,417 Satellites Required
BSA-CIM 4B 10-Yr Fleet CapEx
$4.9B
87.1% CapEx Reduction ($33.1B Saved)
Starship Launches Needed
19 vs. 139
7.3x Fewer Launches for 324 EOPS
Revenue Lifetime / Sat
7 Yrs vs 3 Yrs
2.3x Monetization via OTA Weight Refresh
Satellite Parameter Matrix Grid
Comparing 5 Satellite Configurations
Parameter Metric
Unit
AI6 Baseline
BSA-CIM 4A (Compact)
BSA-CIM 4B (Full Power)
BSA-CIM 4C (Balanced)
BSA-CIM S-Orbit 3
BSA-CIM 4B Advantage
10-Year Constellation Fleet CapEx ($ Millions)
Satellite Physical Footprint: Mass (kg) & Radiator Area (m²)